Legal Opinion

Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 2007No. B188886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOI TODD, J.

The primary issue in this case is whether the County of Los Angeles (County) can force peace officer employees to use excess deferred vacation time in order to avoid a year-end cash payout for that time. Construing the relevant provisions of the Los Angeles County Code and memoranda of understanding (MOU’s) between the parties, we affirm the trial court’s determination that the County does have the managerial power to force the use of deferred vacation time. We reverse the trial court’s award of payment to the employees for excess vacation time hours.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Markman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Branciforte Heights, LLC v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Boothby v. Atlas Mechanical, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Owen v. MacY's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. O'BRIEN v. Camisasca Automotive Mfg., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers' Ass'n v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API