Legal Opinion
Russek v. Unisys Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 10, 1996No. Civ. A. 93-5738 (JEI)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, District Judge:
Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions 1 are all past or present employees of the United States Postal Service (“the Postal Service”). 2 They bring state law design defect and failure to warn claims alleging that Multiple Position Letter Sorting Machines (“MPLSM”) used by the Postal Service and manufactured by Burroughs Corporation (“Burroughs”), to which defendant Unisys Corporation (“Unisys”) is successor-in-interest, caused them repetitive stress injuries (“RSIs”). Defendant Unisys has now moved for summary judgment solely on the grounds that the government…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- San Filippo v. BongiovanniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- LTV Corp. v. Back (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re" Agent Orange" Product Liability Lit.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Fagans v. Unisys Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Quiles v. Sikorsky AircraftDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.