Legal Opinion
Quiles v. Sikorsky Aircraft
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 8, 1999No. Civ 98-11208-DPWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOODLOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Vincent Quiles brought this action against Sikorsky Aircraft, a division of United Technologies Corporation, and against United Technologies Corporation, asserting claims stemming from a helicopter accident which occurred on April 17, 1995. On that day, an HH-60J Coast Guard helicopter experienced a hard landing as a result of a crack in a part called a tip cap. The accident caused back injuries and related problems to Quiles, at the time a flight mechanic for the United States Coast Guard. Quiles has brought claims against the defendant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. Diamond Shamrock CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- In Re" Agent Orange" Product Liability Lit.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- O'CONNELL v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.