Legal Opinion

Coos Bay Logging Co. v. Barclay

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1938PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

This is an action instituted for the purpose of condemning a right of way for a logging road and logging railroad or way. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. A verdict and special verdict were rendered, which, omitting the formal parts, were as follows:

“We the jury, duly impanelled to try the above entitled cause find for the plaintiff upon all the issues, and we assess the compensation damages to be paid to the defendant, Hugh Barclay, by the plaintiff at and in the sum of $1,000.00, and defendant be paid an attorney fee in the sum of $750.00.”
“Special Verdict.

Question 1. What is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bridal Veil Lumbering Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Sawyer v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Smith v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. HawkOregon Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Alaska Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Little v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Port of Umatilla v. RICHMONDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Highway Commission v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API