Bridges v. Alaska Housing Authority
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
This litigation arises out of a condemnation action which has been before us previously. The Alaska Housing Authority had filed a complaint and a declaration of taking against appellant, Mary Bridges, and her property in connection with an urban renewal project. After a review of the applicable statutes, we held the Authority did not have the power to use a declaration of taking. 1 In a subsequent decision we directed the trial court to dismiss the action 2 The effect of this was that the land was returned to appellant. The buildings had been previously destroyed by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Maher v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.