Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Parker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1960PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the State of Oregon through its Highway Commission from a judgment which the circuit court entered condemning and appropriating to the state’s use a tract of real property, described in the complaint and owned by the three defendants, upon the payment by the state of the sum of $3,740. The state as plaintiff-appellant deems the sum excessive.

In appealing, the state submits two assignments of error. The issue which they present is sufficiently revealed by the first of them which reads as follows:

“The court on direct examination of witness H. W. Snell erred in sustaining…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reeve v. DennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Stewart v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  3. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. HeidenreichIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Village of Lawrence v. GreenwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Oregon R. & N. Co. v. EastlackOregon Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Yundt v. D & D BOWL, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API