Legal Opinion

Port of Umatilla v. RICHMOND

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1958PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is an action brought by the Port of Umatilla to condemn approximately 168 acres of land belonging to the defendants Richmond. The trial court gave judgment for the defendants and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals.

The complaint is in the usual form. Paragraph “VI” thereof reads as follows:

“For the development of port facilities, wharves, dock frontage, harbor improvements, storage facilities, cargo handling facilities and for the exercising, carrying out and executing of the powers provided by law for a port, it is necessary and convenient that plaintiff acquire the real property…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State v. FerrantoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Sears v. City of AkronSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hogue v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Carruthers v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API