Hattabaugh v. Housley
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David M. Glover, Judge.
This appeal is a result of a boundary dispute. Appellants, David and Linda Ware and Robert Hattabaugh, argue that the trial judge erred in quieting title in favor of appellee, Jacquelyn Housley, and in finding that an existing fence was not the boundary by acquiescence. We agree that the trial court was clearly erroneous in finding that the fence line in this case had not become the boundary by acquiescence; therefore, we reverse and remand.1
Our standard of review in boundary-line cases is set forth in Hedger Brothers Cement & Material, Inc. v. Stump, 69 Ark. App. 219,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- McWilliams v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Boyette v. VogelpohlCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adams v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Hattabaugh v. HousleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Snc Revocable Trust v. Gerardo R. Galdamez and Amy B. GaldamezCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023