Legal Opinion

Boyette v. Vogelpohl

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 5, 2005No. CA 04-1153PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Appellants Roxie E. Boy-ette and James M. Boyette appeal from the trial court’s denial of their complaint seeking the establishment of a boundary line by acquiescence, or in the alternative by adverse possession, and the court’s granting of the appellees Ray F. Vogelpohl and Teresa M. Vogelpohl’s counterclaim to quiet tile. We agree that the trial court erred in quieting title to the disputed property in appellees, and reverse and remand.

Roxie Boyette and James Boyette own property on Highway 10 in Perryville, Arkansas (the Boyette property). Roxie owns the northern…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Fish v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. McWilliams v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Tull v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Strother v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Thompson v. FischerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Barnett v. GomanceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Follett v. FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Rio Vista, Inc. v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API