Legal Opinion

Hattabaugh v. Housley

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 2005No. CA 04-1295Published

1Opinion of the Court

217 S.W.3d 132 (2005)

Robert HATTABAUGH, David W. Ware, and Linda Ware, Appellants

v.

Jacquelyn E. HOUSLEY, Appellee.

No. CA 04-1295.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, II.

November 16, 2005.

Troy Gaston, Greenwood, for appellants.

Otto R. Fry, Fort Smith, for appellee.

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

This appeal is a result of a boundary dispute. Appellants, David and Linda Ware and Robert Hattabaugh, argue that the trial judge erred in quieting title in favor of appellee, Jacquelyn Housley, and in finding that an existing fence was not the boundary by acquiescence. We agree that the trial court was…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Robertson v. LeesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. McWilliams v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API