Legal Opinion

Summers v. Dietsch

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 24, 1993No. CA 92-894PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Joe R. Summers, appellant, appeals from an order of the Carroll County Chancery Court concerning a boundary line dispute between appellant and appellees, Delmas and Mary Dietsch. The chancellor found that the disputed boundary line was accurately reflected on a 1991 survey and was not located along a particular fence line, as contended by appellant. Appellant contends that the chancellor erred in not finding either that the fence line constituted a boundary by acquiescence or that appellant had gained title to the disputed area on his side of the fence by adverse…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Gregory v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Deidrich v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Rabjohn v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Robinson v. GaylordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Robertson v. LeesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. McWilliams v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Strother v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API