Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. Stump

John F. STROUD, JR., Judge.

Appellants argue that the chancellor erred in ruling that they failed to establish a boundary by acquiescence between their property and appellee’s. They also contend that the chancellor should have enjoined appellee from draining water onto their property. On cross-appeal, appellee argues that the chancellor should have granted him an easement over appellant’s land. We affirm on direct appeal and reverse and remand on cross-appeal.

Appellants own approximately ninety-three acres in Jackson County. Directly south of their property are three contiguous tracts owned by…