Legal Opinion
Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 2010No. A124965PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Albert Lee (Lee) appeals from an order that granted respondents’ motion to compel Lee to acknowledge the satisfaction of a prior order for attorney fees and costs (Code Civ. Proc., § 724.050) and denied in part Lee’s motion for other attorney fees and costs incurred in the proceeding. The appeal reflects the complexities that can arise when a party who prevailed on an anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) motion to strike (§ 425.16) exercises his right to seek attorney fees and costs in connection with the motion, successfully defends against the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Evans v. UnkowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Phillip Carnes Jennifer Carnes Kathryn Schaller Kevin Schaller H. Gene Carnes v. Michael A. Zamani Nancy ZamaniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Bankes v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Wanland v. Law Offices of Mastagni, Holstedt & ChiurazziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Conservatorship of McQueenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Gray1 CPB, LLC v. SCC Acquisitions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Brown v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hernandez v. SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.