Legal Opinion

International Potato Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 7, 1958No. 482-56PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

The basis for defendant’s motion is that plaintiff’s action is barred by the general statute of limitations governing the filing of claims in this court. 1 ****The material facts are not in dispute.

Between February 21,1950, and March 7, 1950, plaintiff entered into ten contracts with the Army whereby plaintiff agreed to sell and deliver a specified quantity of potatoes, in bags, to various military installations.

Plaintiff completed all its deliveries under these contracts by March 21, 1950, and each of its shipments was accepted by the proper officer at the military…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fort Scott v. HickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Battelle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1871
  4. L. E. Myers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Ruff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Steel Improvement & Forge Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Lins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Kayfield Construction Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API