Legal Opinion

Ruff v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1942No. 45298PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

In 1938 plaintiff, in response to the defendant’s invitation, bid upon and was awarded the contract for the construction of a new post office building at Beading, Pa. In this suit plaintiff seeks compensation, beyond the amount specified in the contract and already paid him, for three items: (1) the value of a “diner” restaurant building, which, plaintiff says, the defendant agreed that he might salvage from the site, but which was removed by another person,, to whom it belonged; (2) the cost of excavating a large part of the area formerly covered by the Supreme Bealty Company building, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Weeks Dredging & Contracting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Loftis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  5. Charles T. Parker Construction Company and Pacific Concrete Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API