Legal Opinion

Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 1, 1937No. 42084PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

Certain issues in this case are primarily questions of fact; they are (1) whether plaintiff complied with its contract with the defendant; (2) whether the defendant delayed plaintiff in the prosecution of its work during the time beyond the date specified in the contract for the completion thereof; (8) whether plaintiff filed proper protests; (4) whether the contracting officer was the head of the department within the meaning of Arts. 9 and 18 of the contract; and (5) whether the contracting officer made a final decision as contemplated by the contract with reference to delays and claims of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. McCloskey ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  5. United States v. MuellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  3. New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. L. L. Hall Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Brand Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API