Legal Opinion
Steel Improvement & Forge Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 21, 1966No. 407-62PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURFEE, Judge.
This contract case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The parties have stipulated the facts — ■ the relevant ones of which are included in the body of this opinion.
In 1953, the Government, represented by the Bureau of Ships, Department of the Navy, entered into a contract with Round-Woodhouse Chain and Manufacturing Company (hereinafter Round), for the delivery of a large quantity of chain and chain assemblies. Round entered into a subcontract with a related company, Ohio Hoist and Manufacturing Company (hereinafter Ohio), under which Ohio was to supply…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Empire Institute of Tailoring, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Manufacturers Aircraft Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Battelle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1871
- L. E. Myers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- International Potato Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Saul MacKlin v. Spector Freight Systems, Inc. Saul MacKlin v. Drivers, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 639Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Jacques J. Creppel, Harold L. Molaison, Lloyd James Drachenberg and Marrero Land & Improvement Association, Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.