United States Ex Rel. Burns v. A.D. Roe Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
This qui tarn action is before the Court on motion by Defendant, A.D. Roe Company, Inc., to unseal the Court’s file. Plaintiff, United States of America, does not object to disclosure of any part of the file, save the statement of material evidence submitted by Relator Fred M. Bums. Hence, the sole issue before this Court is whether such statement is discoverable. For the following reasons, we answer that question in the affirmative and grant Defendant’s motion.
I
The Federal False Claims Act (the “Act”), as amended in 1986, empowers individuals to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Albert A. GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Toledo Edison Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company v. G a Technologies, Inc., Torrey Pines Technology DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States ex rel. Stone v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson v. Northrop Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Grand Ex Rel. United States v. Northrop Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Schweizer v. Oce, N.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- US Ex Rel. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996
- United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- United States v. Mount Sinai HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- United States ex rel. Yannacopoulos v. General DynamicsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.