Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Schweizer v. Oce, N.V.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 12, 2008No. Civil Action 06-648 (RCL)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Defendants (“Oce”) have moved [39] to unseal all records filed by relators in this False Claims Act (“FCA”) suit, in which the United States has declined to intervene. Relators oppose [41] this motion. The Court has considered the parties’ various filings, the applicable law, and the entire record herein. For the reasons explained below, Oce’s motion shall be GRANTED.
On April 7, 2006, relators filed their original complaint under seal. They alleged that Oce had run afoul of the FCA in two ways: first, it had knowingly sold non-compliant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bonaccorsy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States of America v. Iss Marine Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States Ex Rel. Durham v. Prospect Waterproofing, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Berliner Corcoran & Rowe LLP v. OrianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Friedman v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.