Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Robinson v. Northrop Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 16, 1993No. 89 C 6111PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Rex Robinson (Robinson), James Fredericks ■ (Fredericks), James Holzrichter (Holzrichter), and Lynn Austrheim (Austrheim) worked for defendant Northrop Corporation (Northrop) at its Defense Systems Division in Rolling Meadows, Illinois. They allege that Northrop defrauded the United States government on several defense contracts. Claiming to have independent knowledge of the alleged fraud, they have sued Northrop pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA). 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1). The suit is brought on behalf of both the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Norman I. Gold v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Black River Constructors, Fort Drum Constructors, and National Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. County of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. NEC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Chandler v. Southwest Jeep-Eagle, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API