Legal Opinion
Rice v. United States
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 13, 1995No. 94-C-264-KPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McCARTHY, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has before it Plaintiff, Markus Allec Rice’s, motion foe protective order AND MOTION TO QUASH WITH REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES FOR RESPONDING TO SAME [Dkt. 26]. The Court has reviewed the relevant briefs, [Dkt. 26, 27], and heard argument of counsel at the November 28,1995 hearing.
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
Defendant has issued subpoenas duces • tecum to third parties pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45 to obtain medical records, school records and Social Security records *557pertaining to the minor Plaintiffs mother, Angela Rice, in this medical…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mary E. Buhrmaster v. Overnite Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Ghandi v. Police Department of City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- O'Boyle v. JensenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by51 opinions
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Dag Enterprises Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Butera v. BoucherSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaADistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.