Legal Opinion
Dag Enterprises Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 11, 2005No. Civ.A. No. 00-0182(CKK)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
“A little neglect may breed mischief; for want of a nail the shoe was lost; for want of a shoe the horse was lost; for want of a horse the rider was lost; for want of a rider the battle was lost. ”
—Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanac (1757).
Currently pending before the Court are two conflicting discovery-related motions filed by the parties in the above-captioned action. First, Defendants have submitted a motion for a protective order, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, in order to prevent the acquisition of new…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Jackson v. Laureate, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1999
- Jeffrey B. Newman v. Ghs Osteopathic, Inc., Parkview Hospital Division. Jeffrey B. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Tesone v. Empire Marketing StrategiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Wannall v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.