Legal Opinion
Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 8, 1995No. 94-4165-DESPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now pending before the court are the following motions:
1. Defendant’s Motion to Quash (doc. 39).
2. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery (doc. 51).
This is an employment discrimination action alleging that defendant violated Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., the Kansas Act Against Discrimination, K.S.A. 44-1001, et seq., and the Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act, K.S.A. 44-1111, et seq. Plaintiff also claims…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Cf & I Steel Corporation, a Colorado Corporation v. Mitsui & Co. (u.s.a.), Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by23 opinions
- Robertson v. Dennis (In Re Dennis)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Transcor, Inc. v. Furney Charters, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Rice v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1995
- Windsor v. MartindaleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.