Barrett v. City of Allentown
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Defendants Supreme Auto Body Works, Michael Fonzone, and Joseph Reiley (“Defendants” or “Auto Body Defendants”) move to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and/or to strike various portions of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a) or 12(f). In the alternative, the Auto Body Defendants seek a more definite statement of the claims against them pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e).1 The plaintiffs, Cynthia Barrett, Sun Splash, Inc. and Baron C. Smith (“Plaintiffs”) have jointly filed a single affidavit in opposition to this motion to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. CullenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Kissi v. PanzerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Bajorat v. Columbia-Breckenridge Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Black v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Untracht v. FikriDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.