Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Cullen

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 26, 1996No. Civil Action 95-287, 95-500 MMSPublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Terry Ann Johnson (“Johnson”) and Charles Ihlenfeld (“C. Ihlenfeld”) have each filed civil rights complaints under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of their Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. Because each complaint is based on the same factual transactions and occurrences, the Court consolidated the cases on October 27, 1995. Docket Item (“D.I.” 28).

Before the Court are defendants Michael G. Cullen (“Cullen”) and Wayne Ihlenfeld’s (“W. Ihlenfeld”) motions to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Smith v. DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  2. Okan's Foods, Inc. v. Windsor Associates Ltd. Partnership (In Re Okan's Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Gibbs v. DeckersDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  4. United States v. Richard Dattner ArchitectsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Ruane v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API