Legal Opinion

United States v. Leigh

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1913No. 1052PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7397 (T. D. 32872).

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case consists of various cast-iron repair or replacement parts for textile machinery. The importations include 3-grooved rim pulleys, flats for carding engines, 40-tooth doffer gears, lattice-shaft brackets, levers for combing machines, and other similar machine parts.

These parts were first cast in molds and subsequently were chiseled, drilled, and machined; they thereby were made ready for immediate attachment to the machines for which severally they were designed. The pieces as imported were separate, were without attachments,- and did not together…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Bromley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  3. Lehigh Mfg. Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. John Bromley & Sons v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Mundo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API