Legal Opinion

United States v. Grinnell Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1928No. 3048PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case consists of various cast-iron pipe fittings, such as tees, elbows, joints, etc., of various sizes. After being cast they were machined — that is, threaded — in order to be used for connecting pipes. As imported they are ready for use, and are articles of commerce.

The collector classified and assessed the merchandise under paragraph 167 of the Tariff Act of 1913, as a manufacture of metal not *256specially provided for. The relevant part of that paragraph is as follows:

Articles or wares not specially provided for * * * if composed wholly or in chief value of iron,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LeighCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Mundo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. Geo. S. Bush Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. Bemo Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API