Mundo Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Landis, Judge:
The merchandise under protest herein was invoiced as “Iron Body Clean Outs, San Francisco Pattern” and “Y’s.” The collector of customs classified it under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, as other articles or wares, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of iron, at 19 per centum ad valorem.
The importers claim that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem as “cast-iron fittings for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Jackson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. LeighCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- United States v. Grinnell Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- L & B Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Hutchinson Brokers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
- Mundo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Mundo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- North American Processing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998