Legal Opinion

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 25, 1949No. C. D. 1152PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawkeNCE, Judge:

This controversy arises out of the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain iron castings imported in a rough, unmachined condition as parts of machines, not specially provided for, in paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and imposing duty thereon accordingly at the rate of 27/ per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff has challenged the decision of the collector by protest and claims that the merchandise is dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem pursuant to the terms of paragraph 327 of said act, as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. United States v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API