Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Michaels

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1988No. D.D. 87-34PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

We find that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(6) as found by the board. Allegations of misconduct based on criminal convictions for actions unrelated to the practice of law have frequently resulted in disciplinary sanctions by this court. For example, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 210, 17 OBR 445, 478 N.E. 2d 796 (extortion in violation of DR 1-102[A][3], [5] and [6], resulting in disbarment); Muskingum Cty. Bar Assn. v. Workman (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 95, 17 OBR 216, 477 N.E. 2d 632 (assault and criminal trespass in violation of DR 1-102[A][3], resulting in one-year…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. LerouxOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WannerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. LisnerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re: Michael J. HoareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Matter of HorwitzArizona Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API