Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Harris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1982No. D.D. No. 82-18PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This court concurs with the board’s finding that respondent’s actions upon which his conviction was based constituted illegal conduct involving moral turpitude in violation of DR 1-102(A)(3). See Bar Assn. v. Chvosta (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 429 [16 O.O.3d 452]; 7 American Jurisprudence 2d 140-141, Attorneys at Law, Section 75: The board recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a one-year period commencing October 10, 1981, the date of his suspension pursuant to Gov. R. V(8). Upon a careful review of the entire record we believe respondent’s conduct warrants his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bar Ass'n v. ChvostaOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MichaelsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoodallOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Muskingum County Bar Ass'n v. WorkmanOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Mason (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. RionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API