Legal Opinion

MacHado v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1940No. L. A. 16188PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is a suit to quiet title to a strip of land which was set apart for a public way in a partition proceeding in 1876 but which was never accepted, used or improved for such purpose and was formally vacated and abandoned as a way by the board of supervisors in 1905. From a judgment for the defendants the plaintiffs have prosecuted this appeal.

The facts stand undisputed and the parties differ only as to the legal conclusion to be deduced therefrom. It appears that the strip of land in litigation, containing about 2.6 acres, was originally a part of the Rancho La Ballona in Los Angeles County…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Miller v. GrunskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Myers v. DaubenbissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baker v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. LOSEE Et Ux. v. JONES Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People Ex Rel. Brown v. Tehama County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Loma Vista Inv., Inc. v. ROMAN CATH. ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API