Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Brown v. Tehama County Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 11, 2007No. C049048PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROME, J.
In this action, the People of the State of California, acting through the Attorney General, succeeded in obtaining an injunction requiring the Tehama County Board of Supervisors to apply the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, 1 § 66410 et seq.) to a lot line adjustment on property owned by defendant KAKE, LLC (KAKE). The trial court then awarded the Attorney General $173,450 in attorney fees against the county defendants 2 under section 1021.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which is the codification of the private attorney general doctrine of attorney fee…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Maywood v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Children etc. Com. of Fresno County v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Roybal v. Governing Board of the Salinas City Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.