Legal Opinion

Lake v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2009No. CV-09-0036-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona law provides that “[p]ublic records and other matters in the custody of any officer shall be open to inspection by any person at all times during office hours.” Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 39-121 (2001). The City of Phoenix denied a public records request for metadata in the electronic version of a public record. We today hold that if a public entity maintains a public record in an electronic format, then the electronic version, including any embedded metadata, is subject to disclosure under our public records laws.

I

¶ 2 David Lake, a Phoenix police officer,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Carlson v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Griffis v. Pinal CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  5. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. O'NEILL v. City of ShorelineWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. O'Neill v. City of ShorelineWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Paint Township v. ClarkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. American Civil Liberties Union v. Arizona Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API