Lake v. City of Phoenix
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
¶ 1 Arizona law provides that “[p]ublic records and other matters in the custody of any officer shall be open to inspection by any person at all times during office hours.” Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 39-121 (2001). The City of Phoenix denied a public records request for metadata in the electronic version of a public record. We today hold that if a public entity maintains a public record in an electronic format, then the electronic version, including any embedded metadata, is subject to disclosure under our public records laws.
I
¶ 2 David Lake, a Phoenix police officer,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. PyleArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Carlson v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Griffis v. Pinal CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- O'NEILL v. City of ShorelineWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- O'Neill v. City of ShorelineWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Paint Township v. ClarkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Arizona Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.