Legal Opinion
O'NEILL v. City of Shoreline
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 2010No. 82397-9PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
240 P.3d 1149 (2010)
Doug and Beth O'NEILL, individuals, Respondents,
v.
The CITY OF SHORELINE, a municipal corporation, and Deputy Mayor Maggie Fimia, individually and in her official capacity, Petitioners.
No. 82397-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued March 16, 2010.
Decided October 7, 2010.
Flannary Pasieka Collins, Ian Richard Sievers, Shoreline, WA, Ramsey E. Ramerman, Everett, WA, for Petitioners.
Michele Lynn Earl-Hubbard, Christopher Roslaniec, Allied Law Group, L.L.C., David M. Norman, Seattle, WA, Michael G. Brannan, Law Office of Michael G. Brannan, Edmonds, WA, for Respondents.
J…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Fisher Broadcasting-Seattle TV LLC v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Sargent v. Seattle Police Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Greenhalgh v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.