Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. City of Shoreline

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2010No. 82397-9PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 This case allows us to consider whether metadata is a public record that must be disclosed under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW. This is a matter of first impression before this court. We affirm the Court of Appeals and hold that metadata associated with public records is subject to disclosure under the PRA.

FACTS

¶2 On September 14, 2006, Diane Hettrick (a private citizen) wrote an e-mail to Lisa Thwing (also a private *142citizen) and possibly others. The relevant portion of the e-mail stated:

Hi folks,

My dear friend, Beth O’Neill has asked me to pass along information about…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Fisher Broadcasting-Seattle TV LLC v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Sargent v. Seattle Police Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Greenhalgh v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API