Legal Opinion

Myers v. Hopland Union Elementary School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1935No. Civ. 5322PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COATS, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff brings this action through his guardian ad litem. He was a pupil in the Hopland Union Elementary School and was of the age of six years when he was injured by a fall from the schoolhouse porch. The action is predicated upon the claim that the school property was in a dangerous and defective condition because there was no railing around the porch, and upon the carelessness and negligence of the trustees in allowing this condition to exist. The court made no findings upon these issues but did specifically find that no verified claim for damages was presented to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Bancroft v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bates v. Escondido Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Phillips v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Spencer v. City of CalipatriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API