Legal Opinion

Mollena v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. of Hawaii, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1991No. 14648 and 14645PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAKATSUKI, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Olivia K. Mollena (Mollena) and Patsyann H. Costa (Costa), appeal from the trial court orders entered June 22, 1990, and July 13, 1990, respectively, denying their cross motions for summary judgment which requested that underinsured motorist coverage be implied, as a matter of law, under their respective motor vehicle insurance policies, and the granting of defendant-appellee, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company of Hawaii, Inc.’s (Fireman’s Fund), motions for summary judgment against Mollena and Costa. The two cases were consolidated for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Cloninger v. National General InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Kuchenmeister v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. FerreiraHawaii Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pacific International Services Corp v. HuripHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sol v. AIG Hawai'i Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Graham-GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API