Legal Opinion

Sol v. AIG Hawai'i Insurance Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1994No. 17038PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAKAYAMA, Justice.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, Lourdes Sol (Lourdes) and Pedro Sol (Pedro) (collectively the Sols) appeal summary judgment entered in favor of defendant-appellee AIG Hawaii Insurance Company (AIG). The Sols contend that the trial court erred by holding a provision in an AIG insurance policy valid. The provision permitted the amount of uninsured motorist coverage in an insurance policy to be reduced by the amount of no-fault benefits paid. We reverse the circuit court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of AIG and remand for entry of judgment in favor of the Sols.

I. BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Methven-Abreu v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gossinger v. Association of Apartment Owners of the RegencyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dawes v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sheffer v. Carolina Forge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API