Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
This is an action against a general contractor by the employee of a subcontractor to recover for personal injuries sustained by said employee which, it is claimed, were the result of the general contractor’s violation of our statutes and the rules of the Industrial Commission. Plaintiff prevailed in the trial court and defendant appeals from the denial of its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Defendant, Foley Brothers, Inc., had been engaged by the Hamm Brewing Co. to construct an addition to one of the company’s buildings according…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Mercer v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Dessecker v. Phœnix Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Devere v. PartenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thill v. Modern Erecting CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Daniel F. Otten v. The Stonewall Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Cayse v. Foley Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Beckel v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Weber v. TuckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000