Legal Opinion

Weber v. Tuck

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 2000No. C5-00-1097Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Mark Weber appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents Ralph Tuck and Ronald P. Meiners. We affirm.

FACTS

Tuck and Meiners jointly owned a parcel of real estate. Tuck offered Weber $6 per hour to help Tuck and Meiners work on the property. Weber accepted the offer. The next day, Meiners instructed Weber to get a ladder and climb to the roof of a building on the property to change a skylight. There was only one ladder tall enough for the task. Meiners told Weber to set the ladder up on a cement pad. Weber did so, and climbed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Dessecker v. Phœnix Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API