Legal Opinion

Beckel v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1965No. 39515PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Plaintiff brought an action for damages for personal injuries sustained in a fall from a ladder owned by defendants while he was engaged in constructing a fireplace for them. The jury found for plaintiff. Thereafter, the court granted defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and plaintiff appeals.

The court found no actionable negligence as a matter of law. The question presented, which we believe is decisive of the appeal, is whether the evidence is sufficient to support a finding that there was a defect in the construction of the ladder which caused…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Dessecker v. Phœnix Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Anderson v. Fred Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goeb v. TharaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Olson v. Arctic Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1972
  3. Wallin v. RappaportCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API