Legal Opinion

Devere v. Parten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1946No. 34,119PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The purpose of this appeal is to review an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial after verdicts for defendants in two separate actions which were tried together. In one action, Ruby DeVere sued to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of defendants’ failure to provide her a safe place to work in violation of statutory duty. In the other action, Gerald A. DeVere, asserting liability on the same grounds, sued to recover for consequential damages sustained by him as her husband as a result of her injuries. For convenience, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bushouse v. BromMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Wilson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Hubbard v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Tevoght v. PolsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1984
  3. Koenigs v. ThomeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Gordon v. PappasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Halloran v. TousignantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API