Legal Opinion
State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 23, 1994No. 15312-2-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
— Hilary Irving Thompson appeals his conviction on a charge of third degree assault. He contends that the trial court erred in permitting the State to cross-examine him about an out-of-court statement he gave to a Port Angeles police officer that was contradictory to his in-court testimony. Thompson asserts, additionally, that the trial court erred in conducting a CrR 3.5 hearing to determine the admissibility of the statement during his case in chief, and in concluding that it was admissible. We affirm.
On May 7, 1991, Hilary Thompson boarded a Clallam Transit bus in downtown Port Angeles.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.