Legal Opinion
State v. France
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 27, 2004No. 29239-4-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
88 P.3d 1003 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Duff Richard FRANCE, Appellant.
No. 29239-4-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
April 27, 2004.
John Michael Sheeran, Pierce Cty Prosecutor S, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
Lise Ellner, Vashon, WA, for Appellant.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, C.J.
A jury convicted Duff Richard France of violating a no-contact order and fourth degree assault. France claims that the trial court erred by admitting statements he made before receiving Miranda[1] warnings. France also claims that the jury instructions violated his right to due process and that the trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State Of Washington v. Alfredo LunaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. E.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Steven PembertonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.