Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 2, 1998No. 21549-7-IIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Mark Lee Miller appeals his convictions for attempted theft of a firearm and third degree assault. He contends that the adoption of an increased seriousness level for theft of a firearm, through the passage of Initiative 159, violates article II, section 19 of the Washington Constitution. In addition, he contends that the trial court erred (1) in not dismissing all charges against him following the court’s finding of prosecutorial vindictiveness; (2) in finding that his statements following arrest were voluntarily made; and (3) in concluding that the evidence was sufficient to support his…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. TroutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API