Legal Opinion
In Re Coale
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 2002No. 98S00-9303-DI-309PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
Because the respondents, both of whom are attorneys licensed in states other than Indiana, solicited potential clients in this state without complying with our rules governing client solicitation, we find today that they should be barred from engaging in acts constituting the practice of law in this state until further order of this Court.
This matter was instituted with the Disciplinary Commission’s Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action, which contained two counts. The first count alleged that the respondents’ written solicitations of potential clients violated the…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In the Matter of WiremanIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Matter of BarrattIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re TonweSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Consumer Attorney Services, P.A. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Coale v. Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- In Re ParilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011