Legal Opinion

In Re Parilman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2011No. 98S00-1012-DI-681Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Discipline Action

Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have submitted for approval a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline” stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline. Respondent’s solicitation of clients within Indiana subjects him to this Court’s exclusive jurisdiction to regulate professional legal activity in this state. See Ind. Const. art. 7, § 4; Matter of Murgatroyd, 741 N.E.2d 719 (Ind.2001).

The Court approves the agreement and finds that Respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re MurgatroydIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re CoaleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API