Legal Opinion
In Re Tonwe
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided May 25, 2007No. 584, 2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. The respondent, Valerie Glover Tonwe (“Glover”) 1 is a Pennsylvania attorney who has never been admitted to practice law in Delaware. In 1991, when the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) learned that she was maintaining an office and practicing law in Delaware, Glover consented to the entry of a cease and desist order. In 2006, the ODC filed a petition alleging that Glover has been violating the cease and desist order, and that her activities in Delaware constitute the unauthorized practice of law. A panel of the Board on Professional…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re SteinerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- In THE MATTER OF McINERNEYMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- In Re CoaleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by16 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- In re NadelSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Steven F. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- In Re DavisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: KoysteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.