Legal Opinion

Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Department

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2008No. Agency T70772; CA A131207; SC S055231PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Petitioner on review, Necanicum Investment Company, successfully challenged a tax assessment by respondent Employment Department (the department). Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Dept., 345 Or 138, 190 P3d 368 (2008). Petitioner now seeks an award of attorney fees and costs. The department objects to the attorney fee request, asserting that petitioner has not met the statutory requirements. For the reasons that follow, we agree with the department, and therefore deny petitioner’s request for attorney fees. We award petitioner costs of $369.24.

We first review the facts in the underlying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership & Trust v. Illinois Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  2. Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API